Shady endorsement of Almagro to Evo Morales liquidates the credibility of the OAS

Secretary Almagro, before Evo Morales at the government offices in La Paz, said: "To say that Evo Morales cannot participate today, that would be absolutely discriminatory with the other Presidents who have participated in electoral processes based on a Judicial decision recognizing the guarantee of their human rights «is a "shady guarantee" because it contradicts the sustained and managed by Almagro himself in this same case, has no clarity or transparency, falls into the realm of the dishonest and dubious legality. With the backing of Almagro, Morales will fulfill his plan. That is why it is urgent to clarify whether Almagro can fight against the dictatorships of Venezuela and Cuba while consolidating the dictatorship of the same criminal group in Bolivia.

Shady endorsement of Almagro to Evo Morales liquidates the credibility of the OAS

Por: Carlos Sánchez Berzaín

Luis Leonardo Almagro Lemes, the secretary General of the Organization of American States (OAS) recognized for applying the Inter-American Democratic Charter, for its fight against the dictatorships of Castro-Chavismo with the case of Venezuela and its harsh allegations against Cuba, has been in Bolivia this 17 May to support Evo Morales ‘ criminal candidacy. An action full of contradictions, a shady guarantee that disfigures to the secretary Almagro, who liquidates the credibility of the OAS and that makes an urgent international clarification.

Morales came to power in January 2006 for a period of 5 years with a constitutional prohibition of consecutive re-election and remains more than 13 years applying the model Castro-Chavez. With a constituent assembly founded on a counterfeit reform law, it liquidated the Republic of Bolivia by creating its plurinational state. But even with its plurinational constitution, it could only be reelected once in a row, what it did with its re-election of the year 2014, having already circumvented that norm when reelecting the year 2009.

Morales convened a referendum on February 21, 2016 asking for his indefinite re-election but lost, winning the PRINCIPLE ‘ BOLIVIA said NO ‘. With more crimes he used the same resource of Chávez in Venezuela and Ortega in Nicaragua, he manipulated the Supreme Court of Justice with a ruling declaring that the constitutional prohibition of consecutive re-election for more than once is “a violation of his human rights”. Then he became a candidate with an Electoral Tribunal under his control against the rejection of more than 70 of Bolivians.

In this way Morales committed crimes of material falsehood, ideological falsehood, use of counterfeit instruments, prevarication of judges and magistrates, abuse of power, organization and operation of criminal group to indefinitely hold power for the purpose of Impunity, in addition to judicializada political persecution and attacks on freedom of the press.

In the face of complaints, petitions and complaints in the Inter-American system, Secretary Almagro on September 22, 2017 wrote on his Twitter: “Evo Morales will have to respect popular decision Q said NO to re-election. No judge can raise the sole sovereign’s opinion: the People.

On 28 October 2017, Almagro requested the ‘ Venice Commission ‘ a ‘ study on re-election ‘, receiving a report stating that ‘ re-election is not a human right ‘. When Almagro presented the report, he insisted that the ‘ report is not a political opinion, it is a document with full legal validity ‘.

Evo Morales rigged the electoral law and created a primary election that was defined by the BBC as “the unusual vote in which no one competes but everyone wins.” An act of simulation and fraud that took place on January 27, 2019, in which it called attention to the dispatch of “OAS electoral observers” without a report known so far.

This May 17th, Secretary Almagro, before Evo Morales at the government offices in La Paz, said: To say that Evo Morales cannot participate today, that would be absolutely discriminatory with the other Presidents who have participated in electoral processes on the basis of a judicial ruling recognizing the guarantee of their human rights. Thus, on behalf of and on behalf of the OAS, Almagro has supported and empowered Evo Morales as a candidate, becoming complicit in the crimes committed.

It is a “shady guarantee” because it contradicts the sustained and managed by Almagro himself in this case, has no clarity or transparency, falls into the realm of dishonest and dubious legality. It is evidenced by Almagro’s argument of supporting Morales ‘ candidacy that it would be discriminatory not to do so when others already did so “on the basis of a judicial ruling recognizing the guarantee of their human rights.” Hugo Chávez and Daniel Ortega have already done so, noted rapists of the essential elements of democracy and the authors of dictatorships in Venezuela and Nicaragua with the Cuban dictatorship. Almagro asks and guarantees to allow one more rape because others already raped!?

Evo Morales is applying the same mature plan in Venezuela in Bolivia. This year’s Bolivian elections are a copy of the elections in May 2018 in Venezuela. With the endorsement of Almagro, Morales will fulfill his plan, but when re-possession in January 2020 be a usurper as it is mature since January 2019. It is objective reality, it is warned by analysts and even a bipartisan resolution of the United States Senate. That is why it is urgent to clarify whether Almagro can fight against the dictatorships of Venezuela and Cuba while consolidating the dictatorship of the same criminal group in Bolivia.

* Lawyer and Politologist. Director of the Interamerican Institute for Democracy *

Posted in
Infobae.com
on Sunday, May 19, 2019

“The opinions published here are the absolute responsibility of its author”