Globalism is savagery
By: Hugo Marcelo Balderrama - 20/04/2025
Guest columnist.Share:
Progressivism is understood as a doctrine that seeks a more equitable, just, tolerant, and inclusive society. Apparently, being progressive is equivalent to being a dreamer who fights for the most needy, excluded, and less fortunate in a society. It is not surprising that young people tend to become militants of this doctrine, as all its tenets appeal to feelings and emotions. The highest stage of progressivism is globalism, since a panopticon that controls and resolves everything at a global level is better than entrusting its noble goals to local governments that can be replaced at the next election.
At the Sustainable Development Summit in September 2015, the UN presented its 2030 Agenda, the most modern version of globalism. It includes 17 goals, which, obviously, were not met, as they are unrealizable fantasies typical of the postmodern left. However, given the failure of the 2030 project, UN technocrats have proposed the 2045 project, an expanded version of the previous agenda. Let's examine and analyze its main points.
1. Sustainable development and poverty eradication: An inclusive development model is promoted that fosters the creation of decent employment, equitable access to resources and opportunities, and the implementation of public policies that reduce the gap between rich and poor. This translates to more taxes, regulations, and subsidies that, in reality, do not combat poverty, but rather capitalism, which, paradoxically, is the only possible way for nations to achieve prosperity.
2.- International Peace and Security: In an increasingly polarized world with rising geopolitical tensions, Agenda 2045 seeks to establish a framework for cooperation that strengthens international peace and security. What it really means is: nations that are less free and subject to an undemocratic global power. In fact, COVID-19 was the first major experiment by a tyrannical technocracy imposing its control measures and vaccines left, right, and center.
3.- Digital Innovation and Cooperation: This seeks to regulate emerging technologies, promote digital cooperation, and ensure that artificial intelligence and other innovations are used ethically and responsibly. It promotes the creation of international legal frameworks to regulate the use of artificial intelligence and data protection, as well as the eradication of hate speech on social media. Basically, it involves global censorship under the euphemism of "hate speech," as all positions are valid, except for Christian, conservative, and pro-life positions, which are the most attacked on social media and internet forums.
4.- Youth and Future Generations: The inclusion of younger generations in global development is fundamental to the 2045 Agenda. It proposes an educational approach that promotes critical thinking, innovation, and environmental awareness. This is perhaps the most contradictory point because, at least since the 1994 Cairo Summit, the UN has promoted population control through methods such as abortion and all the rhetoric against the family. Today, much of the West faces negative birth rates; for example, according to the PEW Research Center, 70% of the European population is over 35. UN bureaucrats should be asked: which young people do they plan to engage in dialogue with in 2045?
5.- Transformation of global governance: Agenda 2045 also advocates for a reform of the global governance system, especially the UN Security Council, to make it more inclusive and representative. This would include the addition of new permanent members from different regions, such as Latin America, Asia-Pacific, and Africa, to better reflect current geopolitical realities. This would mean that countries like Cuba and Iran, whose totalitarian traits are undeniable, would hold important positions. In fact, Fidel Castro always sought to have his Muslim partners as important members of the UN councils.
In conclusion, globalism is not development, but a devastating ideology that represents the most ambitious project of social engineering and total control underway. Institutionalized in organizations that, by definition, have neither homeland, territory, nor people, this ideology seeks to create an anti-democratic political regime of global reach, but along the way, it will destroy nations, freedoms, and lives.
«The opinions published herein are the sole responsibility of its author».